Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2019 № 5 Pedagogical sciences
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2019.61.37.009
UDC: 378.147
BBC: 74.489
D. S. Moklyak ORCID
Master's student of the Department of physics and methods of teaching physics, document management of legal, financial and economic work and long-term development, South-Ural State Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
O. R. Shefer ORCID
Docent, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Professor at the Department of Physics and Methods of Teaching Physics, South-Ural State Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
T. N. Lebedeva ORCID
Docent, Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Informatics, Information Technologies and Methods of Informatics Teaching, South-Ural State Humanities-Pedagogical University
E-mail: Send an e-mail
PROJECT ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS AS A BASIS FOR PRODUCTIVE LEARNING IN HIGH SCHOOL
Abstracts

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of professional

 

training a modern specialist on the example of a student at a pedagogical university in the paradigm of changing the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education (3+, 3 ++) and the applied orientation of teacher education as a direction of study.

Materials and methods. The structure and content of the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education 3++ (FSES HE 3++) are analyzed, conclusions about the relationship of Professional standards and competencies formed in the framework of the main professional educational programs are made. Through refined concepts "readiness for professional activity" and "professionalism", "competence" and "qualification" continuity of educational standards, and also possibility of change of methodical preparation of the future teacher from a position of productive training, introduction in process of training in higher education institution of project activity of students is considered. Within this methodical preparation of students of the training directions 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (dual specialization), implemented at physical and mathematical faculty of at the South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University (SUSHPU), we consider the integral characteristics of "readiness" as a complex pedagogical and psychological characteristics of the future teacher.

Discussion. Based on the developed theoretical justification for the use of design technologies, funds should be used to obtain competencies involving the disciplines of the professional cycle. Their use in most cases, experimental groups are moving to an advanced (increased) level of competency formation. The coefficient of effectiveness of the proposed methodology is the ratio of the total coefficient of formation of components of competencies among students of experimental groups to the same coefficient for students of control groups: = 1,3.

Results. The article analyzes the possibilities of project technology and its application in improving the educational process at the University and the methodological training of future teachers in modern


conditions, presents the results of the control stage of the pedagogical experiment.

Conclusion. Society and the state demand fundamental changes in the training of future teachers. The results of the ascertaining experiment allowed to identify inconsistencies between these requirements and the training of a student of pedagogical University and to determine the key points that need to be included in the training of the student.

Keywords

professional readiness, professionalism, competence, qualification, methodical preparation of the teacher

Highlights

Applied aspects of teacher education can be viewed from the standpoint of the introduction of productive learning in the University;

The competence content of readiness of students to the organization of project activity of students is defined,

The levels of formation of readiness of future teachers for the organization of project activities of students in physics lessons.

REFERENCES

1. Ob obrazovanii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Federal'nyy zakon ot 29.12.2012 № 273-FZ) [On education in the Russian Federation (Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-ФЗ)]. Prinyat Gosudarstvennoy Dumoy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 21 dekabrya 2012 g. [Adopted by the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on December 21, 2012]. Odobren Sovetom Federatsii Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii 26 dekabrya 2012 g. [Approved by the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on December 26, 2012.]. Spravochno-pravovaya sistema “Konsul'tantPlyus”. (In Russian).

2. Kompleksnaya programma povysheniya professional'nogo urovnya pedagogicheskikh rabotnikov obshcheobrazovatel'nykh organizatsiy) [A comprehensive program to improve the professional level of teachers of educational institutions]. Utverzhdena Pravitel'stvom Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28 maya 2014 g. № 3241p-P8 [Approved by the Government of the Russian Federation of May 28, 2014 No. 3241p-П8]. Cetevoye izdaniye “Portal GARANT.RU (Garant.ru)”. (In Russian).

3. O strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda [On the innovation development strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020]. Utverzhdena rasporyazheniyem Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 8 dekabrya 2011 goda № 2227-r. [Approved by order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 8. 2011 N 2227-p.]. Spravochno-pravovaya sistema


“Konsul'tantPlyus”. (In Russian).

4. Ob utverzhdenii professional'nogo standarta “Pedagog (pedagogicheskaya deyatel'nost' v sfere doshkol'nogo, nachal'nogo obshchego, osnovnogo obshchego, srednego obshchego obrazovaniya) (vospitatel', uchitel')” (prikaz Ministerstva truda i sotsial'noy zashchity Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 2013 g. No. 544n) [On the approval of the professional standard “Teacher (pedagogical activity in the field of preschool, primary general, basic general, secondary general education) (educator, teacher)”(Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation of October 18, 2013 No. 544n)]. Cetevoye izdaniye “Portal GARANT.RU (Garant.ru)”. (In Russian).

5 Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta vysshego obrazovaniya — bakalavriat po napravleniyu podgotovki 44.03.05 Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye (s dvumya profilyami podgotovki) (Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 22 fevralya 2018 g. № 125 s prilozheniyem) [On the approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education — undergraduate in the field of training 44.03.05 Pedagogical education (with two specialization profiles) (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of February 22, 2018 No. 125 with the appendix)]. Zaregistrirovano v Ministerstve yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii 15 marta 2018 g. № 50358) [Registered with the Ministry of Justice March 15, 2018 of the Russian Federation No. 50358)]. Spravochno-pravovaya sistema “Konsul'tantPlyus”. (In Russian).

6. Krayneva S.V. (2018) Modelirovaniye protsessa formirovaniya uchebno-professional'noy motivatsii studentov bakalavriata [Modeling the process of formation of educational and professional motivation of undergraduate students]. Professional'noye obrazovaniye. Stolitsa. 2, 29–31. (In Russian).

7. Druzhilov S.A. (2012) Obobshchennyy (integral'nyy) podkhod k obespecheniyu stanovleniya professionalizma cheloveka [Generalized (integral) approach to ensuring the formation of human professionalism]. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya. 1 (21). Available at: http://www.psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2012n1-21/621-druzhilov21.html. (Accessed: 01.06.2019). (In Russian).

8. Shefer O.R., Moklyak D.S. (2018) Gotovnost' budushchikh uchiteley k organizatsii proyektnoy deyatel'nosti obuchayushchikhsya [The willingness of future teachers to organize the project activities of students]. Professional'noye obrazovaniye. Stolitsa. 8, 40–42. (In Russian).

9. Kogan Ye.Ya. (2007) Paradigma aktual'nogo obrazovaniya [Paradigm of actual education]. Peremeny. 5, 120–146. (In Russian).

10. Novikova Ye.A. (2013) Tekushchiy kontrol' urovnya sformirovannosti kompetentsiy v oblasti informatiki i informatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Current control of the level of formation of competencies in the field of computer science and information technology]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2 (91), 233–239. (In Russian).

11. Lapikova N.V., Shefer O.R., Lebedeva T.N., Nosova L.S. (2016) Elektronnaya model' kolichestvennoj ocenki urovnya sformirovannosti kompetencij bakalavrov pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Electronic model of quantitative assessment

 

of the level of competence formation of bachelors of pedagogical education]. Monografiya. Chelyabinsk, Kraj Ra. 216 p. (In Russian).

12. Simonov V.P. (2007) Otsenka kachestva v obrazovanii [Quality assessment in education]. Monografiya. Moscow, Graf-Press. 128 p. (In Russian).